Response by sh0
I don't necessarily believe one is better than the other, especially since this is a utility token above all else
But it's really important to select a channel where the customer lives, and where the user experience can survive without needless friction
The nice thing about an NFT is that the market has been conditioned to see it as an access token.
The promise of decentralization is materializing because people see value in holding NFTs in their wallet. I don't know if they see tokens the same way. Folks don't build emotional attachment to individual tokens they hold obv
The butterfly effect of that is basically crypto twitter. Folks use their NFT as a profile picture to communicate something and to belong, and this proves to be a potent organic growth mechanism through which community can come together
You can still have community around token (i.e. LUNA/Terra in the good old days) but fundamentally the operational work implied to build value over time (after launch) shift towards building trading volume, listing on exchanges, and generally trying to take a piece of the daily circulating supply and gain market share
We don't want to get lost in that kind of flow or create a context in which value is derived from that,
There's a unique opportunity to merge Web2 and Web3 through the DAO and to give Web3 natives an access/utility token that merges the things that attracted them to PFP's (or crypto altogether) with what makes the future of crypto so exciting.